Sunday, November 28, 2010

Final Ideal Society

Something that is uphold in my ideal society is deep thought. If I were to trade any of the choices I made, that would demonstrate a lack of that quality which would make me a large hypocrite. An ideal society does not need to begin with hypocritical thinking, it needs something that has been checked and rechecked before being put into action. Besides the fact that I thought out my choices so I did not need to trade, but the choices of people were not appealing in the least. I knew of the people, but I had never met them in person. Even if I had, I did not know them long enough to know what kind of people they were. Most people chose celebrities, which I see as a large problem. Say I were to have a diva like Paris Hilton in my society of scholars. Even though she has nothing she could really add, I have a feeling she would complain about physical labor and feel that she is somehow about about everyone. My point is, no one knows how their choices would react because they do not truly know who they are, or how they would act.
My ideal society is made of Christina DeSario, Christopher Player, Michael Rossi, Scott Pero, and myself. All of the members obviously know each other, so there is a level of comfort. There is a shared personality type among all of these people. Each one is considerate, generous, intelligent, curious, driven, understanding of how a society should work, with an appropriate amount of altruism. In addition, no one has a particularly crippling disease or disorder. This way, everyone will be able towards the advancement of the society.
However, there are a few problems that might occur within this society. There is a substantial gap between our leader, Mr.Player, and everyone else. The problem here might be whomever is chosen as a successor cannot be because of age, but the leader must find some quality in one of the followers. This might bring another problem about. One follower might become jealous of the chosen successor, believing they are more worthy. This cannot be avoided no matter whom you chose, this is human nature. A final flaw might be the lack of expertize. However, there are several unique skill among those in this society. Including languages, instruments, and all basic school subjects. Luckily, due to the technology available and resources for teaching, a expertize could be given to each member, and they could study to become an expert.

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Ideal Society

In this perfect society of mine, the ideals would be shared by all, Michael Rossi, Scott Pero, Christina DeSario, Mr. Player, and myself. These basic sentiments are already a part of each member’s character, so they will be easy to continue. To begin with, there would be equality. Except the one necessary leader, each member is at the same level of importance. By only allowing the one person power (because he is the eldest) and not distributing any sort of large responsibilities among the rest, the followers will not bicker among themselves whom is more important. Next we would value intelligence. Our leader is a well-rounded teacher, which is a large step in the correct direction. The rest of us each are scholarly people, who enjoy knowledge and strive for more of it. Continuing, individuality would be largely encouraged. We are such a group of diverse people; between us five languages are spoken, at least five instruments are played, and a myriad of other talents are harbored within each member. Peace would be prevalent. Luckily this would not be too large of a problem. We are all calm, level-headed people, who are typically non-violent, yet we have members who can protect us. Finally, acceptance is a must. Due to our diversity, each person has varying beliefs. However because of our level-headed nature, I am confident that each member will hear out a person’s argument.